8 results · ● Live web index
en.wikipedia.org article

Geoengineering - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering

CDR includes methods that are implemented on land or in aquatic systems. Land-based methods include afforestation, reforestation, agricultural practices

Visit
arcticdeathspiral.org article

Geo-engineering By Reforesting - ArcticDeathSpiral.org

https://www.arcticdeathspiral.org/geo_engineering_by_reforesting.htm

The paper suggests that planting trees on 9 million km 2 of currently unforested land would absorb 25% of current atmospheric CO 2.

Visit
kurious.ku.edu.tr research

Changing the Climate with Geoengineering: Promise or Risk?

https://kurious.ku.edu.tr/en/changing-the-climate-with-geoengineering-promise…

Afforestation and Reforestation: One of the most well-known and natural CDR strategies is planting new trees (afforestation) or restoring

Visit
climatalk.org article

An Introduction to Geoengineering | ClimaTalk

https://climatalk.org/2021/07/26/an-introduction-to-geoengineering/

More widely adopted is afforestation and making use of biomass for carbon storage. CCS may be an essential part of the global strategy against

Visit
sciencedirect.com article

Nature-based and geo-engineering climate mitigation technologies

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225005644

# Article Nature-based and geo-engineering climate mitigation technologies: Public acceptance and security prospects. Public attitudes strongly favor nature-based climate solutions like reforestation. Sociodemographic factors like education and region shape climate-tech perceptions. Logistic regression models show public support for varied climate mitigation methods. Climate change requires mitigation approaches, from nature-based to experimental geoengineering. We examined public attitudes toward six strategies—reforestation in previously forested areas, afforestation in new terrains, direct CO2 capture with underground storage, biomass energy with CO2 capture, stratospheric sulfate aerosols, and orbital mirrors—via a representative Czech survey (*N* = 3,007). Results show strong favor for reforestation and afforestation due to ecological benefits and long-term promise; sulfate aerosols and orbital mirrors face skepticism. Older respondents favored biomass-based carbon capture but less so certain high-tech solutions. Our findings highlight the importance of policies aligned with diverse public views, ensuring both established and novel measures are harmonized into an effective climate mitigation strategy. These results indicate demographic contexts shape acceptance of climate interventions.

Visit
climateinterventions.org article

Climate interventions - Afforestation, reforestation and forest management

https://climateinterventions.org/interventions/afforestation-reforestation-an…

Management practices can also aim to reduce carbon sources through: maintaining forests (e.g., preventing deforestation and land-use change), maintaining site-level C density (e.g., avoid degradation), maintain landscape-scale C stocks (e.g., suppress disturbances), and increase bioenergy and substitution (e.g., residue management) (Lemprire *et al*. However, physically, it must be ensured that it does not compete with other requirements, like food and water security, and that it is not detrimental to climate goals, such as local biophysical effects (e.g., albedo reduction might outweigh the effect of carbon sequestration; ​​Pielke et al., 2011). (2021) note that there is currently low understanding of ‘how forest management strategies affect the net removal of greenhouse gasses and contribute to climate change mitigation’, and Roebroek et al (2023) even show that cessation of management strategies and allowing natural forest development can have positive climate effects.

Visit