8 results ·
● Live web index
C
chemistry.berkeley.edu
research
https://chemistry.berkeley.edu/topics/carbon-capture-and-storage
A big advance in carbon capture technology could provide an efficient and inexpensive way for natural gas power plants to remove carbon dioxide from their flue emissions, a necessary step in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to slow global warming and climate change. Developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and ExxonMobil, the new technique uses a highly porous material called a metal-organic framework, or MOF, modified with nitrogen-containing amine molecules to capture the CO2 and low temperature steam to flush out the CO2 for other uses or to sequester it underground. Editors from ACS Central Science and Nature Chemistry have weighed in on new and major chemical research trends in a webinar from C&EN. Experts Chris Chang, a senior editor with ACS Central Science and chemistry professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and Stu Cantrill, the chief editor of Nature Chemistry are interviewed.
B
blog.verde.ag
article
https://blog.verde.ag/en/the-science-of-carbon-capture/
The most common carbon capture technologies include adsorption, absorption, and membrane separation. Let's take a closer look at each of these
N
nae.edu
research
https://www.nae.edu/300509/Engineering-the-Sequestration-of-Carbon
From a technological perspective, the oil and gas industry has the tools and expertise to implement and adopt carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects and contribute to a sustainable future. The engineering of CO2 sequestration itself requires three main domains: (1) separation technologies, (2) transportation and midstream operations, and (3) broader subsurface engineering to identify storage sinks and design efficient systems to safely store CO2 underground. Similar advances in membrane technologies would reduce the cost of CO2 capture, especially around gas streams with low CO2 concentrations. Research and development efforts should focus on developing efficient and low-cost capture technologies covering the whole spectrum to enable large scale CCUS developments. While CO2 capture has been applied to several small power plants, there have been no large-scale applications at power plants, which are the major sources of current and projected CO2 emissions. Although liquefied gas can also be transported by rail and road tankers, these options are unlikely to be considered attractive for large-scale CO2 capture and storage projects (IPCC 2005).
W
wri.org
article
https://www.wri.org/insights/carbon-capture-technology
Policies like the EU's Net Zero Industry Act, the 45Q tax credit in the U.S. and Denmark's CCUS Fund, as well as emerging regulation in Indonesia, are all helping to accelerate the deployment of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS). Today CCUS captures around 0.1% of global emissions — around 50 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2). CCUS is one of many ways to reduce emissions and plays a different role from carbon removal in long-term and net-zero climate plans developed by countries or companies. IPCC scenarios show a wide range of potential deployment of carbon capture technology: CCUS applied to fossil fuels reduces CO2 emissions by 0-5 GtCO2 by 2030 with a median of 1 GtCO2. Companies using or planning to use CCUS at their facilities should adhere to relevant regulatory frameworks; monitor and report the environmental impacts of the technology; engage with local communities; and commit to project agreements, including community benefits agreements.
C
capturemap.no
article
https://www.capturemap.no/carbon-capture-technologies/
These terms are widely used in the industry, and we decided to adapt them for the main categories in our overview of carbon capture technologies in CaptureMap. However when we looked into the details we started running into issues linked to different definitions and criteria for categorising capture projects. Our take on it is that those capture technology categories were mostly defined at a time where power plants were the main targets for carbon capture, and therefore combustion was the main process to be considered. Next on our overview of carbon capture technologies we will talk about oxy-fuel, since it is, in our view, the category most related to post-combustion. > Pre-combustion carbon capture converts fuel into a mixture of hydrogen, CO2 and other gases, through gasification or reforming processes. As mentioned earlier, most of the capacity for carbon capture projects already in operations is concentrated within inherent process capture and pre-combustion. This indicates that the actual capture technology is likely to be inherent process capture or pre-combustion, increasing further the share of capture projects capacities within those categories.
E
energy.gov
official
https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainscarbon-sequestration
Biologic carbon sequestration involves storing CO2 in places where it is stored naturally as part of the carbon cycle. Some carbon is stored in
C
c2es.org
article
https://www.c2es.org/content/carbon-capture/
* Carbon capture, use, and storage technologies can capture more than 90 percent of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants and industrial facilities. This natural gas processing plant serves ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Anadarko Petroleum carbon dioxide pipeline systems to oil fields in Wyoming and Colorado and is the largest commercial carbon capture facility in the world at 7 million tons of capacity annually. The first ethanol plant to deploy carbon capture, it supplies 170,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year to Chaparral Energy, which uses it for EOR in Texas oil fields. Carbon dioxide from a gas processing plant owned by DTE Energy is captured at a rate of approximately 1,000 tons per day and injected into a nearby oil field operated by Core Energy in the Northern Reef Trend of the Michigan Basin. This project involves capturing carbon dioxide from natural gas processing for use in enhanced oil recovery in the Lula and Sapinhoá oil fields.
S
sciencedirect.com
article
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824000502
# Just a moment... [](https://www.sciencedirect.com/). # Are you a robot? Please confirm you are a human by completing the captcha challenge below. Waiting for www.sciencedirect.com to respond. * **IP Address:**34.34.225.149. * **User Agent:**Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/147.0.0.0 Safari/537.36. * **Timestamp:**2026-04-13 04:50:20 UTC. [](https://www.elsevier.com/). * [About ScienceDirect](https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/sciencedirect). * [Remote access](https://www.sciencedirect.com/user/institution/login?targetURL=%2F). * [Contact and support](https://service.elsevier.com/app/contact/supporthub/sciencedirect/). * [Terms and conditions](https://www.elsevier.com/legal/elsevier-website-terms-and-conditions). * [Privacy policy](https://www.elsevier.com/legal/privacy-policy). All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply. [](https://www.relx.com/).