8 results ·
● Live web index
E
eureka.patsnap.com
article
https://eureka.patsnap.com/report-comparative-study-on-carbon-capture-technol…
The convergence of environmental imperatives, policy incentives, and technological innovation has positioned carbon capture as a pivotal technology in the global transition to a low-carbon economy, with significant implications for industrial processes, energy systems, and climate change mitigation strategies. Post-combustion carbon capture technologies focus on removing CO2 from flue gases after the combustion process in power plants and industrial facilities. Technical Solution: Sinopec has developed an integrated carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology system focusing on post-combustion capture using advanced amine-based solvents. The efficiency of carbon capture technologies varies significantly across different industrial sectors, primarily due to variations in CO2 concentration, process conditions, and implementation constraints. Cross-sector analysis reveals that the most efficient carbon capture implementations occur where: (1) CO2 streams are highly concentrated (>20% by volume), (2) capture technology can be integrated with existing heat management systems, and (3) economies of scale can be achieved through centralized capture infrastructure.
C
cetjournal.it
research
https://www.cetjournal.it/cet/25/121/021.pdf
Based on the analysis outcomes, selection criteria are proposed to help match mature technologies (TRL 7–9) to specific gas compositions and industrial applications, primarily for process gases from power plants, chemical industries, and cement production, supporting more efficient and context-dependent implementation and the green transition. 4. Results The analysis of the selection criteria indicates that the applicability of carbon capture technologies primarily depends on the CO₂ concentration of the gas stream, the energy required for separation and regeneration, and the presence of impurities. Conclusions and further research steps The suitability and implementation of carbon capture technologies are highly dependent on several key factors, including the specific application, the concentration of CO2 in the gas mixture, the chemical composition of the CO2 environment (e.g., presence of water vapor, acidic substances, and solid particles), and the prevailing physical conditions such as temperature and pressure (Thiedemann and Wark, 2025).
S
storegga.earth
article
https://storegga.earth/blog/carbon-capture-methods-compared
# Analysis: Carbon Capture Methods, Compared. * Assessing the Viability of Carbon Capture Methods. * Which Carbon Capture Method Is The Best? However, it’s important to note that all carbon capture methods have different climate mitigation potential. ## Assessing The Viability of Carbon Capture Methods. * **Energy-intensity** and if the carbon capture method can, in theory, use renewable energy to complete the process in the future. Carbon capture methods are about more than the extraction of CO2. The pricing of this carbon capture method is mid-range, yet it doesn’t yield the highest utilisation of CO2 per year. This land management carbon capture method enhances the natural storage of CO2 in soil. Unlike other carbon capture methods that offer the same level of permanency — such as carbon mineralisation — DAC is easy to monitor with clear ways to measure its climate benefits. This alone makes it one of the most accountable carbon capture methods. ## Which Carbon Capture Method is The Best?
V
voices.uchicago.edu
research
https://voices.uchicago.edu/triplehelix/2025/01/02/carbon-capture-technologie…
# Carbon Capture Technologies: A Comparison. Instead of attempting to mitigate carbon emissions, carbon capture techniques aim to scrub existing CO2 from the air, thereby reducing the greenhouse effect. By far the largest carbon capture plants are those that are attached to refinery and power-producing facilities for oil, coal, and other traditional fuels. A less sophisticated method of carbon capture is the use of the most prolific carbon capturer to date: trees. [5][13] Therefore, the price per metric ton of carbon dioxide captured per year is approximately $82 and $3750, respectively. [13] Thus, the answer to the question of which carbon capture and storage method will take over is complicated. “World’s Largest Carbon Capture Plant Opens in Iceland.” *Smithsonian**Magazine*, September 9, 2021. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/worlds-largest-carbon-capture-plant-opens-iceland-180978620/. “Capacity of operational large-scale carbon capture and storage facilities worldwide as of 2020.” Published February 1, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1108355/largest-carbon-capture-and-storage-projects-worldwide-capacity/. “Alberta Carbon Trunk Line Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project.” . “Combustion processes for carbon capture.” *Proceedings of the**Combustion Institute* 31.
S
sciencedirect.com
article
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S036054422301993X
# Comparative analysis of CO2 capture technologies using amine absorption and calcium looping integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant. The main goal of this work was to compare two CO2 capture technologies integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant in different retrofit configurations in terms of their energy performance as well as economic outcomes. ### Process integration of a Calcium-looping process with a natural gas combined cycle power plant for CO2 capture and its improvement by exhaust gas recirculation. [32] compared the energy and economic performances of two CO2 capture technologies using amine absorption or calcium looping integrated with natural gas combined cycle power plant. Therefore, the main objective of the work is to compare the typical CCU-methanation [25–30] and the novel ICCU-methanation processes based on calcium looping (CaL) carbon capture from a coal-fired power plant (CFPP), which is the first techno-economic analysis of ICCU-methanation, to the best of our knowledge.
C
ccsknowledge.com
article
https://ccsknowledge.com/tools-resources/ccus-technology-comparison-guide/
# CCUS Technology Comparison Guide. Selecting the right carbon capture technology is a complex challenge, one that demands careful consideration of site-specific conditions, utility constraints, and operational goals. This Technology Screening Tool was built to streamline the process, helping you short-list appropriate capture solutions based on your project’s unique criteria. From liquid amines to advanced materials like metal-organic frameworks, this tool offers insights into each technology’s strengths and limitations. The information provided focuses on point source carbon capture. Learn more about the criteria used in this tool here. We would like to acknowledge Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) for providing technical support of this assessment. Further information of the technologies can be found in the Global CCS Institute’s Technology Compendium, here. The CCUS Insight Accelerator (CCUSIA) is a partnership between the Government of Alberta and the International CCS Knowledge Centre to accelerate and de-risk CCUS by sharing knowledge and developing insights from projects.
P
pubs.acs.org
article
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03025
We evaluate and rank carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies using three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods.
P
pik-potsdam.de
article
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/members/edenh/publications-1/Viebahn_etal.pdf
For the German situation this approach arrives at the following conclusions: - CCS technologies emit per kWh more than generallyassumed in clean-coal concepts (total CO2 reduction by 72–90% and total greenhouse gas reduction by 65–79%) and much more if compared with renewable electricity – nevertheless, CCS could lead to a significant absolute reduction of GHG-emissions within the electricity supply system; - depending on the growth rates and the market development, renewables could develop faster and could be in the long term cheaper than CCS based plants; - especially, in Germany, CCS as a climate protection option is phasing a specific problem as an huge amount of fossil power plants has to be substituted in the next 15 years where CCS technologies might be not yet available.