8 results ·
● Live web index
S
sciencedirect.com
article
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544225003251
By utilizing various oxygen generation methods (e.g., cryogenic distillation, membrane-based separation, etc.) and hydrogen production techniques (e.g., reforming, membrane-assisted separation, etc.) alongside a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), it is feasible to design diverse power plants with nearly zero CO2 emissions. Despite the growing interest in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC)-based systems for clean and efficient power generation, limited studies have comprehensively compared different methane reforming techniques integrated with SOFCs from energy, economic, and CO2 emissions perspectives. This study presents a comprehensive technical, economic, and environmental assessment of six optimized MCFC-based power plant configurations, each integrated with different CO2 capture technologies: calcium looping (CaL), cryogenic CO2 capture (CCC), proton exchange membrane electrolyzer-based CO2 capture (PECC), oxygen membrane-based CO2 capture (OMCC), and vanadium chlorine-based CO2 capture (VCC). The integration of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) with Carbon Capture technologies has shown promising potential for sustainable energy production and emissions reduction.
U
usea.org
article
https://usea.org/sites/default/files/media/Power%20Plant%20Co2%20capture%20he…
... power from the CO2 capture-equipped power plant compared with when it had more conventional compressors (Table 10). The basis for the comparison was a PCC-CO2.
E
etsmtl.ca
news
https://www.etsmtl.ca/en/news/diverses-options-captage-carbone-centrales-elec…
Comparing CO₂ capture technologies for power plants to identify the most efficient, cost-effective, and deployment-ready options.
R
researchgate.net
research
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257712003_Comparison_of_Current_and_…
GE is actively investigating and developing novel technologies for both capturing and compressing CO2 from power plants with potential lower
U
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
research
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AGUFMGC12G0510H/abstract
The current study aims to compare two post-combustion CC technologies viz. calcium looping and MEA (monoethanolamine) based scrubbing, which can be retrofitted
P
pik-potsdam.de
article
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/members/edenh/publications-1/Viebahn_etal.pdf
For the German situation this approach arrives at the following conclusions: - CCS technologies emit per kWh more than generallyassumed in clean-coal concepts (total CO2 reduction by 72–90% and total greenhouse gas reduction by 65–79%) and much more if compared with renewable electricity – nevertheless, CCS could lead to a significant absolute reduction of GHG-emissions within the electricity supply system; - depending on the growth rates and the market development, renewables could develop faster and could be in the long term cheaper than CCS based plants; - especially, in Germany, CCS as a climate protection option is phasing a specific problem as an huge amount of fossil power plants has to be substituted in the next 15 years where CCS technologies might be not yet available.
A
apn-gcr.org
article
https://www.apn-gcr.org/publication/cost-benefit-comparison-of-carbon-capture…
Cost-benefit comparison of carbon capture, utilization, and storage retrofitted to different thermal power plants in China based on real options approach.
R
re.public.polimi.it
article
https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/e0c31c0e-7d49-4599-e053-1705fe0aef77/The…
This arrangement is commonly found among utilities, since it adds operational flexibility as required by a Nomenclature AMP 2-Amino-2-Methyl-1-Propanol ASC advanced supercritical CCR CO2 capture ratio (–) COT combustor outlet temperature (C) E emission rate (kg CO2/kWhe) EBTF European Benchmarking Task Force ESP electrostatic precipitator FGD flue gas desulphurization GECoS group of energy conversion systems GT gas turbine HR heat rate (kJLHV/kWhe) HRSG heat recovery steam generator IGCC integrated gasification combined cycle IP intermediate pressure (bar) LHV low heat value of an specific fuel LP low pressure (bar) MEA monoethanol amine NGCC natural gas combined cycle PCC post combustion capture PZ piperazine SCR selective catalytic reduction SPECCA specific primary energy consumption for CO2 avoided (GJ/t CO2) TIT turbine inlet temperature (C) DTmin minimum temperature approach in lean-rich heat ex-changer (cold side) (C) Greek symbols g net electric efficiency of the power plant (% LHV) has decreased from the early values of 4.2 GJ/t CO2 [11] to 3.2–3.6 GJ/t CO2 [12,34] thanks to improved solvent formulations, advanced process configurations and the introduction of heat inte-gration.