8 results ·
● Live web index
A
abnamro.com
research
https://www.abnamro.com/research/en/our-research/esg-economist-is-carbon-capt…
While much focus has been on reducing emissions (like using renewable energy or sustainable fuels), carbon capture and storage (CCS) is gaining attention, especially for hard-to-abate sectors like heavy industry and transport (shipping). Carbon capture involves removing CO₂ from the emissions of fossil fuel combustion before it enters the atmosphere. Separating CO₂ from gases (like those emitted by power plants or factories) is key to carbon capture. The graph below on the left shows the cost of capture and cost of avoidance for the industries cement, hydrogen and steel and for the Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (or CCGT) in the power sector. As the graph above shows it is not attractive for the power sector to make the investment in CCS as the cost of capture and the cost of avoidance lie above the current ETS price. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for achieving net-zero emissions, particularly for sectors where emissions are hard to eliminate.
R
rhg.com
research
https://rhg.com/research/state-ccs/
This report is a state-by-state analysis exploring the economic benefits associated with carbon capture retrofit opportunities at existing industrial and electric power facilities. The Great Plains Institute (GPI) commissioned Rhodium Group to conduct an independent analysis exploring the economic benefits associated with carbon capture retrofit opportunities at existing plants in the US. Phase I of this study is a state-by-state analysis focused on opportunities in 21 of the states participating in the Regional Carbon Capture Deployment Initiative. GPI identified the industrial and electric power facilities examined in this phase as carbon capture projects with near- to intermediate-term feasibility. Rhodium identified the facilities in Phase II as near- to intermediate-term carbon capture retrofit opportunities. In addition to using the near-to intermediate-term facilities from the previous phases, Rhodium identified a separate group of long-term opportunities with carbon capture retrofit feasibility by 2050. The direct economic benefits considered include private sector investment and employment opportunities associated with the construction and operation of carbon capture retrofits.
S
sciencedirect.com
article
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969723022763
by SC Gowd · 2023 · Cited by 124 — This review assessed the economic feasibility and sustainability of CCS and CCU technologies to identify the barriers to commercializing these technologies.
L
lsu.edu
research
https://www.lsu.edu/ces/publications/2023/economic-implications-carbon-captur…
. 48 The Economic Implications of Carbon Capture and Sequestration for the Gulf Coast Economy 2 Center for Energy Studies List of Figures Figure 1: Regional energy consumption and production. . 43 3 A Case Study of Gulf Coast Sequestration 1 | Executive Summary Countries around the world have made ambitious commitments and are implementing policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across their economies.1 Simultaneously, private companies are making similar commitments and investments to reduce their carbon footprints across global value chains. This report focuses on how the Gulf Coast region of the United States might reduce its greenhouse gas footprint by capturing industrial carbon emissions and storing carbon dioxide (CO2) permanently underground.
C
carbonherald.com
news
https://carbonherald.com/new-stanford-study-challenges-viability-of-carbon-ca…
A study conducted at Stanford University, led by Mark Z Jacobson, challenges the prevailing notion of carbon capture as a viable climate solution.
P
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
official
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3108120/
by PE Hardisty · 2011 · Cited by 88 — Capturing and geo-sequestering CO2 entrained in natural gas can be economic and sustainable at relatively low carbon prices, and in many jurisdictions makes
N
news.mit.edu
research
https://news.mit.edu/2025/smart-carbon-dioxide-removal-yields-economic-enviro…
The study identifies BECCS and biochar as most cost-competitive in removing CO2 from the atmosphere, followed by EW, with DACCS as uncompetitive
N
nature.com
article
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-025-00468-5
This work employs molecular dynamics simulations to examine storage efficiency by analyzing the impurity systems’ density across a wide temperature and pressure range. This paper applies MD simulation methods to analyze the influence of impurities from DAC on CO2 storage over a wide range of temperatures and pressures (20–120 °C, 60–320 bar) encompassing most of CCS projects globally. Based on the density calculation, the Normalized Storage Efficiency caused by Impurities (NSEI) is proposed to evaluate the storage potential and cost in impure CO2 projects. Gases 11, 610–618 (2021)."), this study adopts their storage cost model to calculate the Normalized Storage Efficiency caused by Impurities (NSEI) and evaluate the impact on storage efficiency and costs. **Fig. 5: Normalized Storage Efficiency Caused by Impurities (NSEI) at different pressures and temperatures.**. To provide more practical advice for impure CO2 storage, this study further analyzes the temperature and pressure gradients of potential storage sites, which can be found in Supplementary Table 1.